Herd Immunity, Herd Mentality, Whatever

 

Leader of the Herd

 Trump has been all over the herd immunity   issue, for it, against it, understanding it, not   understanding it. He has behaved almost like   a herd of buffalo on the open range—all over   the place.

 Herd immunity in the face of a pandemic is a   good thing in the same sense that winning a   war is a good thing. It is not so much a time of joy as it is a moment of relief. A long nightmare—and that is what all wars are, even ones we win—is over. It is the point a nation arrives at only after a period of suffering, destruction and unnecessary loss of life.

There have been leaders in the past who were victorious because they were willing to sacrifice wave after wave of their own citizens against the enemy. Good leaders seek victories that come with minimal casualties. Winning at all costs is not a goal, only a last resort. Reaching herd immunity is gaining victory through attrition because all else has failed.

Yes, herd immunity in a pandemic is a good thing when a nation arrives at that point, but it comes at a high price. It’s a victory not attained through smarter, less destructive means, but rather by senseless inaction.  

Trump has been promising since day one that the coronavirus will go away—first in a few days, then by Easter, and most recently when we reach a state of herd immunity.

Actually, what he said was, "And you'll develop, you'll develop herd—like a herd mentality. It's going to be—it's going to be herd developed—and that's going to happen. That will all happen," Trump said.

I can’t imagine what Trump would say if Biden explained herd immunity this way.

Maybe it will happen, but there are things we can do, more pro-active measures that make more sense than waiting around for herd immunity.

Wearing a mask and social distancing might push the moment of herd immunity further into the future, but it would save lives until a possible vaccine provided a victimless herd immunity.

In my book, Trump Dismantles Washington, there is a chapter where I describe Trump as the laziest man in America. His need for slogans, nicknames, easy solutions to complicated problems point to Trump, at his core, being a very simple man too lazy to rise to any occasion. For him, an insult is always preferable to an idea.  

Waiting around for herd immunity, while at the same time ridiculing mask wearing and social distancing is probably the laziest thing a leader can do. It takes no courage, no strategy, and no particular skill. Someone who, when talking about the pandemic says, “It is what it is,” will also conclude herd immunity is our only way out. He’ll wave his hands around, as if he were holding a wand and say, “It will go away like magic.”

What do we say to a man so lazy, so ignorant, so out of touch?

We could say, “You’re fired.”

We tried that a month before coronavirus landed on our shores. In fact, we were told at the time that if we didn’t get rid of him, things would only get worse. That was way back in the good old days of January.

We couldn’t fire him then because the Republican Party was suffering from herd mentality and Trump was leading the herd.

Wear a mask, social distance, be safe. Don’t wait for 250-million Americans to become infected to take a victory lap.

 

Winning at all cost can cost a pretty penny

Donald Trump is the single most unqualified individual to ever come this close to winning the presidency. This is scary, but the scariest reality by far is that some Republicans, while agreeing he is unqualified are nevertheless admitting that they will vote for him.

Why?

Because they cannot possibly, under any circumstances, bring themselves to vote for Hillary Clinton. Hillary is a politician in a year when no one is hated more than politicians.

In fact, she is not hated within the Democratic Party as much as she is hated within the Republican Party who have hated the Clintons even before hating the Clintons was cool. In her favor, she is not hated within the Democratic Party as much as Trump is hated with the Republican Party.

It would seem that the Republican Party has cornered the hate market. I could be wrong. If so, tell me.

Who do they love?

The Republican Party has worked harder than anyone in the past eight years to foster a hatred of government, threatening to shut it down regularly and shutting it down on one occasion.

Then, in the height of arrogance, they have run on a platform that government isn’t working.

Winning is so important to Republicans—and losing, so distasteful—that they are willing to put the country at risk if it means salvaging a win.

To be sure, many Republicans cannot bring themselves to vote for Trump and will actually vote for Hillary because they realize what the stakes are.

Unfortunately, there are far more who while they cannot vote for him, will not vote for her. If this results in Trump winning the election, so be it. That’s the price, they will tell you, for living in a democracy.

Then, there are those who support Trump one hundred percent. They are behind him come hell or high water—and it will come because it always comes when you leave the gates open.

These folks like him because—

He is not politically correct.

He talks like them, says what they want to hear.

He is as angry as they are, even though like him, they don’t have that much to be angry about—upset with, maybe, but angry? Come on.

He is a smart businessman who has made billions.

Apparently, they also like him when they learn he is a businessman who has lost billions but smart enough to channel that loss into avoiding taxes for a couple of decades.

They like him because we’ve become a country that caters too much to the have-nots that he disparages at every opportunity he gets. It’s time, his supporters will tell you, that we start paying attention to them—many of them also have-nots, but have-nots in a good way, the American way.

I don’t blame Trump for his political success. I find much of his business success questionable and possibly abhorrent and don’t understand why more people don’t feel this way, but I never really understood the appeal of The Apprentice, so maybe I’m not the best person to judge.

He’s not the first person with an obnoxiously high opinion of himself.

I do blame those who support him despite never hearing a single proposal that made sense and a lot of stuff that makes no sense.

He wants to increase government spending, lower taxes and balance the budget. This alone should make Republicans want to look around and scream, “Next?”

The words out of his mouth are divisive, insulting, abrasive innuendos, easily disproven lies, and worst of all for a man who wants to be our spokesman to the world—incoherent.

I do not understand how winning could be so important to people that they would be willing to accept a Trump presidency. They have looked at all his negatives and decided he is better than someone who has worked for American citizens all her adult life, served honorably as a United States Senator, created a successful charitable foundation with her husband, served as Secretary of State during a difficult time that offered no easy solutions but plenty of opportunity for partisan criticism. In short, they are choosing a nincompoop over a politician because now, being a nincompoop seems more attractive than being a politician.

If Trump were to win, succeed in shaking the government up and it turns out badly, I think the consolation for many of his supporters would be, well, at least we won the election.

A not-so-famous man once said, “Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing.” A famous man is credited with saying it but fact-checking, like politicians, are passé this year.

The point is, it wasn’t true then and it isn’t true now.  

Trump supporters had better come to their senses, because the matter rests largely in their hands. The next autopsy might be for the country and not just the Republican Party.